Protests at Council Changes

The Conservative Controlled Kent County Council has voted to ask the Labour government to cancel the local elections set to be held in May.

The decision was taken by the cabinet of the County Council on Thursday afternoon.

The Conservatives believe that faster cooperation with Labour's scheme will unlock desperately needed cash for the county more quickly.

Therefore the Conservatives say voting for a new County Council would be a waste of resources, given that it will be abolished under the Labour plans, as well as leading to delays while new people learn their council jobs.

But protestors outside County Hall and opposition politicians believe the biggest overhaul of local government for 50 years is being rushed.

Cancelling the May elections would also mean the Conservative reign at County Hall could be extended from 4 years to 6 years - the party had been expected to lose control of the county at the vote.

The final decision on cancelling the elections will rest with the Labour government.

The Labour scheme involves an elected mayor for Kent.  The existing 12 lower tier Borough councils, Medway unitary council and KCC would be all probably be replaced by just 3 new "unitary" councils covering much larger areas than the existing Borough Councils.

Southborough Town Council and parish councils like Bidborough would not be affected, although it is possible that new town councils for Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells (probably with very few powers) will be set up.

Sevenoaks, Tonbridge, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells Borough Councils are likely to be merged into one authority. That would meet the government's threshold for having a population of at least 500,000 for a unitary authority.  The four boroughs add up to 557,000 people on the 2023 population estimates.

(Sevenoaks, Tonbridge & Malling and Tunbridge Wells only add up to 373,000 people, so would be too small for one of the new local authorities, making the inclusion of Maidstone a near certainty. Even assuming a 4% population rise by 2027 would still only take the population covered without Maidstone Borough to 388,000.)

Many opposition parties, smaller parties and independents fear that the planned bigger authorities will make voters feel alienated from decision makers based many miles away and work to the benefit of national parties.

Merging Dartford, Gravesham, Medway and Swale into a "North Kent" authority would be a 672,000 population.  And merging Ashford, Canterbury, Thanet, Dover and Folkestone & Hythe would serve a 668,000 population.  The total population of Kent county is around 1.9 million.

Currently the "upper tier" Kent county authority looks after social care, education and transport.  The Borough Councils look after planning and bin collections.

Labour say a "unitary" structure will cut costs and make things simpler for voters to understand. But some politicians fear Labour's giant councils will smooth the way for the government's accelerated new house building schemes with fewer planning delays.

Before the meeting, Stuart Jeffery, Green Party leader at Maidstone council (shown below), said: “There are a bunch of proposals which are being made today and we feel the changes that are being foisted on us are being rushed and the vote today will be about whether we go even faster".

“It will end up with the elections being cancelled and we want to see a slower process; we want to see proper discussion and engagement with people and we want an outcome that works for Kent.”

He said that stopping the elections in May was “killing democracy”.

Around 20 demonstrators chanted “don’t kill democracy” ahead of the extraordinary meeting of the council on Thursday 9th January.

 

More reporting from SIMON FINLAY, Local Democracy Reporter:

Under the current proposals, a mayor could be in place in Kent by May 2026 and polls taking place for the unitaries a year later or in 2028.

The government deadline for the devolution priority list applications is January 10.

A White Paper was launched in December by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner which was dubbed a “Devolution Revolution”.

The government wants to simplify the way local councils are run and hand down more powers and responsibilities to communities.

The new model would aim to promote greater efficiency and drive down costs.

Kent hopes to be given increased powers and more money to provide better services to the tax-payer.

The decision to apply for the devolution priority programme (DPP) was ratified by KCC’s cabinet this afternoon after a four hour extraordinary meeting of full council earlier today.

During an impassioned and sometimes fractious debate, members of the opposition sought to make amendments, especially on delaying the KCC elections this May.

But leader of the Conservative administration, Cllr Roger Gough (below) argued that devolution and council reorganisation is going to happen under the government plans.

He told members: “Devolution – that is what will bring us the powers, that is what will bring us the funding, that is what will bring us the national voice and that is what we should focus on.”

Later he added: “The destination is very clear – it is a mayoral strategic authority and local government reorganisation. The challenges are enormous…and we have a huge responsibility to get that right for our residents.”

Cllr Gough said the mayor role is not “a one person dictatorship” but a partnership with the new unitary authorities.

Deputy KCC leader Peter Oakford (below) told members: “Kent residents are relying on the experienced councillors in this room to represent them, do what is best for Kent and the best for its residents.

“We don’t have a choice. Devolution and local government reorganisation is coming and (the) government have already set the rules. Kent in my opinion…must be at the forefront and help to shape this.”

Cllr Oakford said the suggestion all the power will go to one person, the mayor, is “totally incorrect” as there will be elected members of the unitary authorities.

He added: “Unitary authorities remove the two tier confusion for our residents and has the authority to provide services to all residents at a lower cost and with greater efficiency.”

Later as he addressed his cabinet colleagues, Cllr Oakford sounded a note of caution.

He said: “The government has an idea of where it wants to start, it has an idea where it wants to be at the end but there is an awful lot in the middle that it hasn’t been thought through.”

Cranbrook Conservative Cllr Sean Holden (below) launched an excoriating attack on the direction of travel facing the council if it is accepted on the DPP.

He told members: “Despite anything we say here, by a cabinet decision of one tenth of the elected members, KCC will go along with Labour government plans to abolish it early to get Kent into the first devolution phase, meaning we get an all-powerful mayor.

“These London-style mayors are elective dictatorships.  Labour’s plans to cancel May’s elections symbolise the democratic shortfall of that system.

“Mayors are not accountable to an assembly. They can’t be removed between elections no matter how incompetent or venal, unlike council leaders or even Prime Ministers.

“They can be made government stooges much more easily than 81 (KCC) councillors.

“Labour purports to streamline government by removing one layer in the unlamented districts. But it puts another, unaccountable, layer straight in over our heads.

“Democracy should not be shoved aside with cancelled elections because it’s a bit of nuisance for bureaucrats. Let them work around it.  While Kent County Council is a lawful authority it should stand by its regular elections, even if for a shortened term.”

His words were echoed in the chamber by independent councillors Mike Baldock and Barry Lewis.

Cllr Baldock said: “There’s an old saying that fools rush in and that’s what seems to be happening here. It’s quite simple, we are asking for you not to ask (the government) for the election to be cancelled.

“Don’t rush forward. Get it right.”

Tory Cllr Lottie Parfitt said the staff and officers must be supported in the future through a “great deal of change and uncertainty”.

But she begged her colleagues to “search their souls” to make a decision that is best for Kent.

Labour’s Karen Constantine said council workers in Kent are suffering “worry and anxiety” and she is working with unions, hoping there are no compulsory redundancies but secure enhanced severance arrangements for those who do lose their jobs.

Fellow Tory Sue Chandler said she can see the benefits of the new arrangements in securing better outcomes issues such as transport and employment.

Liberal Democrat Ian Chittenden said the Tories were looking for a postponement of the KCC elections in May was the “only way they could retain power”.

The loss of second tier borough and district authorities meant the role of the parish and town councils would become more important, said Thanet councillor, Tory Ros Binks.

She told colleagues: “Most people don’t care what sort of council we have as long as it works.”

Highways and transport chief Cllr Neil Baker said the new arrangement could lead to better roads, eased congestion, ring-fenced budgets and enhanced public transport.

Cllr Baker said there will be people who will mourn the traditions that will be lost with the abolition of borough and district councils but noted “traditions are innovations that caught on”.

Councillors of all parties were asked to endorse ongoing work by all councils on devolution; to endorse the fast track approach under the government’s devolution priority programme; to note that mayoral elections may take place in May 2026 and that the KCC election in May might be postponed, subject to a ministerial decision.

There were 39 in favour, 18 against and one abstention.

Later the KCC cabinet unanimously agreed to request, along with Medway Council, to be included in the Devolution Priority Programme and to seek permission to postpone the KCC election in May.

More from WEST KENT NEWS

  • Council Abolition Criticised

    The Conservative leader of Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council, Matt Boughton, has said Labour's planned reorganisation of local government is "deeply regrettable".

  • Spa Valley Rail Appeal

    The Tunbridge Wells heritage railway says it needs to raise £300,000 to replace a corroded bridge.

  • Pembury set to get 200 new homes

    There's concern about traffic gridlock if two new housing developments in Pembury go ahead.

  • Water Charges Soar

    Water bills in West Kent are to rise by around 50% over the next five years.

  • Councils Under Threat

    Both Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells are likely to lose their Borough Councils under changes just announced by the Labour government.

  • "Better Streets" Consultation

    The Liberal Democrat council in Tunbridge Wells has abandoned proposals to stop through traffic from using many residential roads in the town.

  • Environmental Initiative

    Tunbridge Wells Borough Council says a tree planting scheme which was promised at the last local elections has got underway.

  • Eridge Park Event

    The next Black Deer American music festival has been cancelled but organisers hope the event will return in 2026.

On Air Now Alan Rustad 7:00am - 10:00am

COMING UP

  • West Kent Today

    10:00am - 1:00pm

    West Kent Today

  • Lunch Break

    1:00pm - 2:00pm

    Music, News & Features sponsored by The Arty Farty Retreat